The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we talked about coenzyme q10 a little bit earlier and coenzyme q10 is one of these compounds one of these molecules and the electron transport chain in the mitochondria and all the carnivores I work with have coins on q10 levels that are off the charts in a good way heart is particularly rich in coenzyme q10
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
coq10 is good for the heart how interesting that it's in the heart yeah heart yeah okay so so you take the the most bioavailable nutrient you could get from a veggie and you cannot even compare it to the organ which is the heart in terms of the nutrient density
you're going to get from what would you say the richest source is in in the animal-based world of coq10 would it be harder okay makes sense right coq10 is good for the heart how interesting that it's in the heart yeah heart yeah okay
Heart is also a rich source of something called coenzyme q1 part of the mitochondrial electron transport chain
if you're eating beef you're getting a lot of coenzyme Q10 but there's even more more of it in heart