Andrew Huberman· PhD
And generally they will miss the five-minute mark. They will think, they'll let six minutes pass and they'll think it was five minutes when they've underestimated how much time has passed.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And generally they will miss the five-minute mark. They will think, they'll let six minutes pass and they'll think it was five minutes when they've underestimated how much time has passed.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And when people have elevated levels of 5-HT or whether or not they've ingested cannabis, they tend to underestimate how much time has passed.