The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
In addition, try and place, whatever it is that you're focusing on directly in front of you, but not have it extend too far out to either side of your eyes, try and generate a fairly restricted visual window as we call it. And if you can, try and place whatever it is you're focusing on at least at nose level or above, that it might take some engineering or some ingenuity and creativity in order to figure out how to do that, but that's going to be most beneficial.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.