Andrew Huberman· PhD
Cause as long as you can see and move the eyes, people never think about it, that it can be trained, that it can be improved, et cetera, and the effects of it are far reaching.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Cause as long as you can see and move the eyes, people never think about it, that it can be trained, that it can be improved, et cetera, and the effects of it are far reaching.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We do not move the eyes as well as we think we do because as long as you can see and move the eyes, people never think about it that it can be trained that it can be improved etc. And the effects of it are farreaching.