Andrew Huberman· PhD
Then you tell him the joke a third time, or a fourth time, and with each subsequent telling of the joke he found it a little less funny.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Then you tell him the joke a third time, or a fourth time, and with each subsequent telling of the joke he found it a little less funny.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
He's not fibbing, OK. And there are number of ways that you can measure this, especially if you make it, sadly, some survival based things. TOM SEGURA: Yeah. ANDREW HUBERMAN: You tell him the joke again. And he laughs again, but a little less. And the next time a little less and a little less. And eventually he's like, yeah, that was not really funny.