The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
to image the movement of the dye in the brain, and they didn't close that hole in the skull with a lens or something else to keep the pressure in. So all the pressure was gone, so the lymph couldn't move along at all. They didn't observe it. They concluded it wasn't there, and everyone believed them, not her, because they were the more famous, larger groups.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.