The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
cerebrovascular disease has there's largely speaking you can die sort of through embolic events which are the majority of them can you explain for people what embolic events are yeah so taking a step back what like what what does the brain need more than anything it needs blood flow anything that interrupts blood flow to the brain that results in esea is uh devastating
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.