The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I could imagine if I have two mugs in front of me for those listening if I hover my finger on one of them longer than others and I say would you like to drink from this mug and keep it there for 10 seconds or this one and I just tap the other one briefly do you think you bias the probability of which one somebody will pick absolutely
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.