The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the one thing you really wanted is to talk to this person because I don't know you're attracted to them I don't know and you say hi nice to meet you I'm aie what's your name the moment they say they're name you will never forget it because you care you want a lot of times we say hey what's your name we don't mean it we don't care about the answer and that's a big part of why we don't remember it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.