Andrew Huberman· PhD
collagen is a I say protein it's not really it has a protein score of zero it does nothing to affect skeletal muscle mass it is devoid in tryptophan and it is very low in the branch chain amino acids
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
collagen is a I say protein it's not really it has a protein score of zero it does nothing to affect skeletal muscle mass it is devoid in tryptophan and it is very low in the branch chain amino acids
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The amino acid profile is not terrific, from the perspective of muscle protein synthesis. Low in leucine and other branch chain amino acids, higher in other amino acids.
So collagen is not necessarily the protein you want to take if you want to build muscle. Got But it does have the precursors to make collagen and potentially the signaling molecules and the deptides.
why would it work or why would it have an effect because the suggestion is and that's the story behind it there's actually two stories one is that collagen has a lot of glycine and Proline and of course collagen is composed in your body also a lot of glycine and Proline and maybe does not a love of those amino acids in our uh in our Foods in our nutrition but of course um it doesn't matter that it actually increases muscle protein synthesis