Andrew Huberman· PhD
And just really not trying to turn inflammation into this terrible thing to the point where you're starting to do other things that are potentially damaging.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
And just really not trying to turn inflammation into this terrible thing to the point where you're starting to do other things that are potentially damaging.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
show that the molecule of curcumin is foreign to the human body as all these plant molecules are and can have many damaging negative effects in the human body
what else is curcumin doing in a human individual that could be harmful there are many studies the dark side of turmeric a dark side of curcumin is one i've referenced others in my book that show that the molecule of curcumin is foreign to the human body as all these plant molecules are and can have many damaging negative effects in the human body
remember turmeric for instance it's touted it's a beautiful thing i've talked about this many times there are many compounds in turmeric that don't appear to be good for humans
use it as a medicine not a food it's not something you should be taking every day