Paul Saladino· MD
my overarching perspective on curcumin is that we're overusing it and then it's used to often to fight inflammation which we're not getting to the root cause of
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
my overarching perspective on curcumin is that we're overusing it and then it's used to often to fight inflammation which we're not getting to the root cause of
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we don't conflate turmeric as an anti-inflammatory as actually fixing the problem because if there's inflammation in the human body the curcumin in turmeric can help with that but the inflammation is also telling us something and from my perspective that inflammation is signaling that there's a problem with the food we're eating and there's something else going on
why are you taking curcumin for inflammation without correcting the cause of the inflammation i'll repeat it again why are you taking curcumin for inflammation without correcting the cause of the inflammation this is lunacy