We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
high level the idea here is that studies showing harm from fructose are either: -feeding this in isolation (fructose without glucose leads to malabsorption and concomitant dysbiosis-> increased endotoxin) -done in animal models with VASTLY different rates of de novo lipogenesis than humans.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so all these studies people are going to show you about fructose being bad first ask yourself is it done in rats and mice who have increased the noble lipogenesis is it isolated fructose is it a massive dose is it hypercaloric and then are there any studies that actually show this in fruit and honey like real foods the answer is no