The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And what they found is that on the X chromosome, they had inherited a rare mutation in the MAOA gene. So, MAOA is an enzyme that degrades monoamines that, you know, regulate how your neurons are talking to one another. And women have two X chromosomes. So if they inherit a bad version, they're still the other version. Whereas men only have one X. And so from their mom, they got a 50/50 shot. Am I going to get the the mutated version or the nonmutated version?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.