Peter Attia· MD
because it could be that um the it's you're indirectly affecting the epigenome with these yamanaka factors and that if you translated that into an epigenetic programming protocol you could have a lot more control over it
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because it could be that um the it's you're indirectly affecting the epigenome with these yamanaka factors and that if you translated that into an epigenetic programming protocol you could have a lot more control over it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what those factors do is they basically wipe clean the epigenetic changes that have happened happened over time um and also what's amazing is that they restore those cells back to a if you take it far enough back to a plop poent state so essentially you get you know virgin new cells that could differentiate into any cell type in the body right