The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
There are many reasons why Lamarckism and inheritance for acquired traits became such a bad term. One of the biggest is what happened in the Soviet Union under Stalin. There was a scientist named Lysenko, who thought that Mendelism, normal genetics, is bourgeois science, shouldn't be done. And whoever did normal genetics was either killed or sent to Siberia.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.