Andrew Huberman· PhD
And I actually think that the most interesting players today are RNA molecules.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And I actually think that the most interesting players today are RNA molecules.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Right, and it is true that also in mammals now, RNAs and small RNAs are a leading candidate for something that could mediate the transmission of stress protection or also of harmful effects that transmit between generations.