What we want in an ideal situation is to be able to implement the most stress possible 'cause that's the driver of adaptation. Recover from that. Now we get the most adaptation, and adaptation being simply a change.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
What we want in an ideal situation is to be able to implement the most stress possible 'cause that's the driver of adaptation. Recover from that. Now we get the most adaptation, and adaptation being simply a change.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what has to happen is you need that extremely high peak but then you have to be met with an extremely sharp recovery back down