Andrew Huberman· PhD
So you want to walk a pretty fine line, and for most people I would say hedge a little bit on the side of less sore than more so. Because frequency is very, very important for almost all these adaptations.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So you want to walk a pretty fine line, and for most people I would say hedge a little bit on the side of less sore than more so. Because frequency is very, very important for almost all these adaptations.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So your actual total volume say across the month is actually going to be lower because you went way too hard in those workouts, had to take too many days off in between.
What's your training program look like? I told you the story earlier, wife getting super sore. That was there's not a supplement there that we can do to fix her. That was a training program error.