The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's primarily in this case nature if you don't have the genetic capacity to run fast you won't run fast sorry you just don't you don't have enough type two fibers whatever it is proportion of type two FIB it could be limb length it could be joint structure uh typically faster people have tighter smaller joints typically faster people have longer tendons and smaller muscle bellies typically faster people have more type 2x fibers typically faster people are slightly taller
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.