The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And then there's mastery, and then there's this top tier, which is this beautiful, thin layer that so few people occupy, which is virtuosity, in which the practitioner invites variability and chance back in as an opportunity to do truly new things.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, there is some kind of a dynamic sleeve in which you can move in as long as you are not out of this sleeve, you are still within the boundaries of achieving the result that you're after. And then, the result is adaptation of all these elements inside to keep you in the sleeve. The sleeve is not constricted as we once thought, "Oh, beautiful technique." There are many ways to skin a cat, and that experience, and that variety, that diversity goes into virtuosity.