The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I actually prefer coaching the 200 for a couple of reasons there's a little bit of tactics in the 200 or there's more tactics than there are in the 100 in the 100 the fastest person is going to win in the 200 depending on how you tactically set up your race because it's not an allout Sprint you can't run as fast as you can for 20 seconds whereas 100 m you can run as fast as you can for 10 to 11 seconds
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.