in general speed and power stuff is so light it almost require because it's non- fatiguing it requires almost no no recovery
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
in general speed and power stuff is so light it almost require because it's non- fatiguing it requires almost no no recovery
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
a lot of the speed and power-based training it it's low intensity enough that it can be done fairly often and incorporated into my program which already touches on strength and hypertrophy and indeed some endurance work as well
speed training and power training are almost identical you can do them at a very high frequency you want to do complex movements you don't want to do typically isolation single joint movements you're want to do things you can move as fast as you can you can do them very frequently if you're a very elate Sprinter you know you got to be careful of your hamstring and stuff like that but for the most part physiologically it's low fatigue it's low total volume it's high quality and you just now are going lighter so that you can move faster