The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
some people will use this torsional system extremely effectively and there'll be a lot of it and some they'll be a little bit less they're a little bit more linear and they'll still be good that's all dependent upon their own individual and unique structure their morphology their genetics how they're built and how they're born what to do what they do with it as they as they age
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.