Peter Attia· MD
well you you want to err on the side of safe certainly until you start getting a better handle on which aches and pains are normal and which ones aren't
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
well you you want to err on the side of safe certainly until you start getting a better handle on which aches and pains are normal and which ones aren't
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
um i mean there's a whole another we you know we can get into things like you know balance training or training load monitoring you know well let's yeah let's talk about acute versus chronic lifting i mean i used to have an um a program called training peaks that would track this for me so it saw every single day how many miles i rode and it actually did it more by kilojoules than miles so it was total energy expenditure but um if you were giving someone some guidance some rules of thumb if they were becoming active and we'd have to get into the formulas but just using the principles of acute versus chronic load balance how would you help them think through everything you just said with these metrics
well you you want to err on the side of safe certainly until you start getting a better handle on which aches and pains are normal and which ones aren't
well you you you you want to air on the side of safe certainly until you start getting a better handle on which aches and pains are normal and which ones aren't