The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because when you step down you have to apply the brakes and that's where most people falter much harder to walk downhill than uphill uphill is taxing your cardiovascular system but if you slow down enough you're fine but a lot of people don't have the ability to slow themselves down when they're walking downhill and so when an older person steps off a curb and can't fully stop themselves and that results in a fall
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.