so I'm working but I don't have a very clear Direction I lack specificity so I'm working but I'm not seeing a lot of improvements
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so I'm working but I don't have a very clear Direction I lack specificity so I'm working but I'm not seeing a lot of improvements
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you want to make sure you grow your biceps you better make sure your biceps are working having said that if you over rely on specificity you're going to increase the likelihood of overuse injuries which is going to come back and actually hamper consistency over time all right so this is when hedging towards specificity is important but too much can cause a problem if you go the other direction and you go too much variation so imagine you're just sort of doing all kinds of different exercises every time you you work out that's actually not enough stimuli directly on the muscle or muscle groups or movement pattern if you're wanting to learn a new movement um to get you very far
if you to use your terms over index on variety and randomization great you've made yourself super resilient against novel challenges you struggle to make any specific progress though
if we did a random workout every single day you would have a really hard time progressing there's not enough stimuli of stressor onto a system for it to adapt
if you over index on specificity you make progress in those exact areas but you've now opened up the window of lack of resilience