Andrew Huberman· PhD
the frequency of sessions distributed throughout the week correlates with the improvements in limb range of motion.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the frequency of sessions distributed throughout the week correlates with the improvements in limb range of motion.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Basically, what they found was that a six-week training program using very low-intensity stretching had a greater positive effect on lower limb range of motion than did moderate-intensity static stretching.
The most interesting aspect of the study was the greater increase in active range of motion compared to passive range of motion by the Microstretching group.
especially given that earlier we heard that Microstretching of the kind of non-painful sort low-intensity sort is actually going to be more effective for increasing end range of motion.