You can also just kind of do it with feel, in the sense that say you want to do a set of five repetitions, and you do the load, and you think I could've done one or two more. And then you kind of have an idea of what that number's going to be.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
You can also just kind of do it with feel, in the sense that say you want to do a set of five repetitions, and you do the load, and you think I could've done one or two more. And then you kind of have an idea of what that number's going to be.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.