Paul Saladino· MD
I did some fasting and every other day I would do like a liquid fast I just kept the calories below 500 which is way different and maybe you're not gonna see the same results from autophagy
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I did some fasting and every other day I would do like a liquid fast I just kept the calories below 500 which is way different and maybe you're not gonna see the same results from autophagy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but there's also things like alternate day fasting or extended fasting where you fast longer than 24 hours and that the effects of that would be primarily of just increased Papaji as well as a weight loss and you can't really do those things all the time you can do them every once in a while for like medicinal purposes but yeah like there you can do them consistently all the time
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.