Andrew Huberman· PhD
Claude McKay did Clark restriction. He put cellulose in the food of rats, so they couldn't get as many calories even though they ate. And those rats lived 30% longer
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Claude McKay did Clark restriction. He put cellulose in the food of rats, so they couldn't get as many calories even though they ate. And those rats lived 30% longer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
He put cellulose in the food of rats, so they couldn't get as many calories even though they ate, and those rats lived 30% longer.
Yeah. Well, in the old days, we typically would take out 30%, sometimes even 40% of the food with the mice and they'd be hungry all the time and it wasn't very pleasant.
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.