Andrew Huberman· PhD
and wait another three to four hours after training once we have our results from our intermittent fasting study back we will we will have a better answer here
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and wait another three to four hours after training once we have our results from our intermittent fasting study back we will we will have a better answer here
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
rarely is it okay to weight train fasted than not break the fast and eat for three or four hours after training so in other words y train fasted I do this but then also not eat immediately following training and wait another three to four hours after training once we have our results from our intermittent fasting study back we will we will have a better answer here
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.