We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I can't think of a scenario in which I would go too fasting to try to enhance performance so whether or not you can maintain some level of performance probably um will it provide any benefit I struggle to find scenarios in which that would actually make you perform better
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's a lot of people that go too far with fasting there's a lot of people that go too far with intermittent fasting there's a lot of people that go too far with ketogenic states this is just my perspective and they they will end up um on the losing end of that of that slide and ultimately sacrificing performance
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.