We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
because unfortunately our space of fitness and health is filled with an unbelievable amount of empirically validated awesome things and like a 10 to1 ratio of just like [ __ ], fly by night dogma insane schemes of people being like oh lay in this [ __ ] dumbass machine and have these raise blaster dumbass it's going to cost $50,000 but there's one study out of like some lab in Denmark in 2003 that said it was good and that's it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.