The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And when I say lymphatic flow, what I really mean is the passage of fluid from the interstitial extracellular space into these lymphatic vessels. Sometimes people will call them "lymphatic ducts," but that's actually a technical term related to something else. But into these lymphatic vessels, then through these vessels and back into the venous blood supply, where all sorts of good things happen, and we'll talk about it in a bit.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So they're one-way vessels, and if you think about the lymph that accumulates and then goes into the vessels in, say, your feet, if it's a one-way vessel, you know you need... That vessel is going to be directed towards the heart, right? The fluid will be able to go towards the heart, right? Because eventually that's where this stuff needs to go. It needs to dump back into the venous blood supply, get oxygenated, and so forth, and the waste has to be disposed.