Bryan Johnson· Author
85 is like the standard cut off but I like to go for you know 80. because it's uh you know there's inaccuracy in
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
85 is like the standard cut off but I like to go for you know 80. because it's uh you know there's inaccuracy in
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what my safety levels are 75 decibels I never go above that yeah that's very safe that's very safe
my safety levels are 75 decibels I never go above that yeah that's very safe that's very safe yeah 85 is like the standard cut off but I like to go for you know 80. because it's uh you know there's inaccuracy in these desperate meters often as well