We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
So it's really a basic set of chemical players that are involved here and so basic, in fact, that if you were to disrupt any one of these chemical players-- either the luteinizing hormone, the FSH, the testosterone from the Leydig cells, or androgen-binding protein-- you would observe pretty marked disruption in spermatogenesis or the elimination of sperm entirely.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.