The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so the point is that bpas bps's and phalates are not good for endocrine function and they are present in basically all Plastics unless it says no BPA or all phalates removed they're present in herbicides Etc and they are of real concern
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the trick is that instead of BPA they use BPS sneaky rat and BPF and these are chemicals these are lookalikes they're analoges and they're just as harmful
by the way it's kind of the evil twin of phalates because phalates are anti-androgenic and B is estrogenic
in reality usually they've replaced bpa-free bottles with filleted plastics or bps or BPA for BPA F there's all these BPA analogs so bisphenol A is BPA but you can make this phenol s you can make literally just about any alphabet soup you want with this phenols just ABCD efg and it's just purely manipulating the chemistry a little tiny bit so you legally don't have to call it VP a so you can say BP s that's probably the most common one and they've done Studies on a number of these quote unquote analogues these molecules that are similar to BPA and all of them come back at least as estrogenic some of them are more estrogenic
bpa free doesn't mean there are no bisphenols no other xenoestrogens in the plastic it's really hard in 2022 to have healthy hormones as a man or a woman