Andrew Huberman· PhD
Oxytocin, Pair Bonding, Vasopressin; Biological Redundanc
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Oxytocin, Pair Bonding, Vasopressin; Biological Redundanc
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And turns out that levels of vasopressin and/or vasopressin receptor dictate whether or not they're monogamous or not. And there's actually some interesting evidence in humans. When people report their behavior, assuming they're reporting accurately, that vasopressin and vasopressin levels can relate to monogamy or non-monogamy in humans as well.
So the most likely other candidate it's going to be vaseesscent because the same folks who had sort of identified oxytocin as being sort of really important for pair bonding. It also suggested vasopressin might play sort of you know a similar role and vasopressin like oxytocin is a neuropeptide hormone. So it's about nine amino acids. Um, so it's a short peptide um and it binds a different receptor vasopressin receptor 1A that regulates pair bonding behavior.