The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if hyperlactin prolactin is elevated it has no carcinogenic effects breast cancer especially the estrogen is that the breast cancer is known to be different by prolactin there was a study with brahmocryptin once again show a full cure of 70 of the breast cancer cases full cure full remission nothing else no surgery no radiation no other chemotherapy other than a bromocriptine
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
people get going on anti-estrogenic drugs especially women with breast cancer uh until I think the early 2000s prolactin used to be a biomarker as part of the panel for what are the woman's cancer is in remission or not
very often doctors will see that basically breast cancer is taking an aromatase inhibitor or like these serums known as tamoxifying clomiphine Etc and if the prolactin levels start to blow up the doctors will start to get worried saying like you're not responding or you we didn't take the all the tumor out during surgery and whatnot