Andrew Huberman· PhD
there is huge loss in human reproduction meaning the more eggs you have at a younger age the better the ROI on this process is going to be
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is huge loss in human reproduction meaning the more eggs you have at a younger age the better the ROI on this process is going to be
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So the incentive to do it younger is that it's going to be less expensive in the long run.
In principle, if I freeze a 25year-old's eggs, I will have three times as many eggs to work with, you know, than I would if she's going through IVF when she's 37.