The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the sequence of events of when you're estrogen dominant and progesterone deficient which is the follicular phase and people will come in having Labs drawn randomly and they're all concerned that they don't have progesterone and when you talk to them about where they are in their cycle you say you're not supposed to have progesterone that's your follicular phase this is perfectly normal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.