Andrew Huberman· PhD
So you don't have to have a pathology in order for a lab to be indicated. You just have that pertinent symptom.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So you don't have to have a pathology in order for a lab to be indicated. You just have that pertinent symptom.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, you don't have to have a pathology in order for a lab to be indicated. You just need to have that pertinent symptom.