We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
However, the benefits of it, you think of lipolysis, decreased body fat, increased lean body mass. A lot of those, you can use other things to get those benefits. So then you don't need growth hormone for those benefits. It just leaves cosmetic benefit to which you can usually use topicals to get. Your hair and your skin and your nails, there's a lot of other things that you can do other than growth hormone.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.