The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I believe and the urologists I spoke to who are interested in fertility and male health and sexual health suggest that men get their sperm analyzed at least once every five years and certainly, if they're going to want to conceive children in the distant future, that they consider freezing their sperm because that, too, is fairly nominal cost in order to freeze sperm at a younger age.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So the basic takeaway here is that, if you're a woman, to get your egg count-- your antral follicle count, that is-- and therefore your reserve of eggs, indirectly measured, and of course also get your AMH levels measured, and if you're a male to have a sperm analysis and to do that relatively early.
I think especially for younger men who are hearing this um who are not at the point where they want to conceive um it's really important to start thinking about these issues for all all the reasons you mentioned