Andrew Huberman· PhD
Unless on average they were exposed to more prenatal testosterone than straight women.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Unless on average they were exposed to more prenatal testosterone than straight women.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
That doesn't mean you can predict how much testosterone one person was exposed to from their digit ratio because other things influence the diger ratios.
I didn't see any difference there. which itself is interesting because it implies more or less equivalent amounts of prenatal testosterone exposure