Andrew Huberman· PhD
That has been observed anecdotally where pot smokers have a higher incidence of developing something I mentioned before gynecomastia, breast bud development. Or full-blown breast development in males.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
That has been observed anecdotally where pot smokers have a higher incidence of developing something I mentioned before gynecomastia, breast bud development. Or full-blown breast development in males.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Yes, it certainly can, and there's a pretty good association between smoked THC and gynecomastia.
the kind of range the testosterone stayed in was always the normative range like it was never that it went so low that someone would have classified as being hypogonadal or would lead to something like gyom at least from a testosterone deficiency side
cannabis and it's not clear if it's THC itself or other elements in the marijuana plant promote aromatase activity now this has been observed anecdotally where pot smokers have a higher incidence of developing something I mentioned before amastia breast Bud development or full-blown breast development in males