Andrew Huberman· PhD
In the US, it's 900. And so if you're 1,200, are you really super physiological?
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
In the US, it's 900. And so if you're 1,200, are you really super physiological?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as long as it's keeping someone's testosterone in the normal reference range which is somewhere between 300 and 1,200 NRS per Des