Andrew Huberman· PhD
if she's been on it since early in her menopause and has not developed any of these diseases and she wants to keep going we're going to keep her on
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if she's been on it since early in her menopause and has not developed any of these diseases and she wants to keep going we're going to keep her on
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so if I have a patient who comes in and she she's she's more than 10 years P her menopause or over the age of 60 and has not been on HRT then we start looking at risk factors for cardiovascular disease or stroke and so we're looking at her blood pressure her lipids her you know cholesterol and triglycerides and looking for things that are going to put her at higher risk
there's like you're already getting at the point that there's a lot of data and a lot of reasons to keep going and we've all heard some famous friend quote when do you stop your hormones you know some variation of like 3 days before you die or you know I don't know I I've heard that from a few different ways from a few different experts
Although um, you know Rachel Rubin was a guest on this podcast and she made a very compelling argument for the fact that that's a little bit of a BS argument and that really there you know if a woman is 60 and she's been in menopause for 10 years that's not disqualifying and and and there's no evidence that we can point to that we're driving you know rates of breast cancer by giving that woman hormones and so if she's going to benefit from it then she should be on it.