Andrew Huberman· PhD
in all my training it was always put them on birth control because it w it it will suppress ovulation and suppress the over production of androgens in their system
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
in all my training it was always put them on birth control because it w it it will suppress ovulation and suppress the over production of androgens in their system
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We use it for all everything, right? But it does work to treat the symptoms of PCOS. It makes the periods regular. It helps with the skin. It helps with the hair loss. It helps with all of that.
When you say hormonal treatments, you mean like spironolactone and things like that? We usually start with birth control pills.
Um, if the goal is to treat the hyperendrogenic symptoms like the acne and the heretism, again, hormonal treatments usually effective for that.
It'll regulate the cycles, decrease androgen levels, help with heretism and acne, etc.